#Macbusiness free#

The end is man.'(Kant, 1991) Thus, Kant suggests that we have no direct duties to animals. 'Animals are not self-conscious and are there merely as a means to an end. However, animals are not autonomous according to Kant's believe.

#Macbusiness free#

In order to have autonomy one must have free will which means self-consciousness and the capacity to be guided by reason. 'Act as to treat humanity, both in your own person, and in the person of every other, always at the same time as an end, never simply as a means.' (Kant, 1991) Basically speaking, Kant means that individual should respect people by not using them in the way they would not consent to since people are autonomous. This topic has generated a lot of debates for years, some people argues that in order to maximize the benefit for entire human beings, it is worth to sacrifice some animals while some opponent argue that besides the rule of mother nature, human has no right to sacrifice the lives of animal to benefit itself.įrom philosophical perspectives, there are some different points of view that could provide some explanation about animal right. Is Animal testing necessary for cosmetics? It seems that the diversion of this ethical issue has already caused damages to those companies, no matter which decision they made. This difficult problem complex the decision making for managers. This law has changed a lot, for those companies that refused doing animal testing for their products, they have to reconsider the whole situation whether or not going to China market, and which ethics standard they should believe. Just when the animal testing about to have a happy ending, China, the biggest market in this world, decided to remain its regulation to launch animal testing to cosmetics industry.

While those behave companies like Body shop and Mac, they against animal testing way before they doing business, so as the released of this regulation, animal issue is paid highly attention again by people, those ethical companies are benefit from it as well. Those big cosmetics corporations such as P&G, Johnson's and L`Oréal are gradually shut down their labs for animal testing and announce that they are not going to do animal testing again. Recent years, issue of animal testing has been highly valued, especially in Europe, in 2013, EU has already banned animal testing officially.

Purpose to become prettier is not that persuasive as purpose to save human lives is. However, for people who against animal testing, research for cosmetics and household products seem not to be that importance as medication test is. Indeed, creations of vaccine, antibiotic and medications have already save lives around the world. Most people would feel that the benefit of medication testing does benefit for the entire human world. This question probably could be deducted to following reason. The importance of drug and medication test is important for no doubt, the issue of animal testing in medication seldom brings as much debates as animal test in cosmetics and household product does. To discuss further, to what extent does animal testing out weight than any injury that made to those animals? As we know, animal testing is mainly used in drug testing, cosmetic testing and household product testing. In the other hand, some opponent s argues that animal testing is useless because those animals have their own rights, if the research is definitely causing animals irritant reactions and body injuries, what exactly the right do human have to make those animals suffer such painful procedure? Animal testing has generated a lot of debates, some people argues that animal testing is necessary since benefit for human being is the most important reason of animal testing, even though it brings an amount of harmful and discomfort to those animals being tested. Animal Testing in Cosmetics Industry- with regards to EthicsĪnimals have been studied since ancient Greece, and today, they are used in lab research for drugs, cosmetics and household products.